WYATT et al v. APTER et al
| ARLISHER HARVEY and CHAUNCEY C. WYATT |
| GARY M. APTER, APTER PROPERTIES and JOHN DOES |
| 1:2015cv00450 |
| March 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS - The Court GRANTS the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 9 ), and the Court DENIES as moot the Defendants' Renewed Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 12 ). This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final judgment will follow by separate order. Copy to Plaintiffs via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/18/2015. (JLS) Modified on 11/18/2015 (JLS).
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER - Defendants Gary M. Apter and Apter Properties, LLC ("Defendants") have filed a 9 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' pro se Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) (Dkt. 9). Defendants allege that federal question jurisdic tion does not exist in the present action and all of Plaintiffs' claims are comprised of Indiana state law claims. Plaintiffs shall have through June 26, 2015 to respond to the Motion. **SEE ORDER** Copies Mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/10/2015.(MGG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
