UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $299,745.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
$299,745.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY |
JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR. |
1:2023cv01584 |
September 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
M Kendra Klump |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 REPLY in Support of Motion re #10 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Claimant JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Warning Ticket, #2 Exhibit GOVT MOTION TO DISMISS, #3 Exhibit NOTICE OF SEIZURE)(Gray, Stephen) |
Filing 14 ORDER - This matter comes before the Court on claimant Jose Manuel Garcia, Jr.'s Motion for an extension of time to file a reply in the above captioned case, Dkt #12 . The United States of America filed a notice of no objection, (Dkt. #13 ). The Court, having reviewed claimant's Motion and being duly advised, hereby GRANTS the Motion. Claimant's Reply Brief is due October 30, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 10/24/2023. (JSR) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to October 30, 2023 re #10 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Cosby, Traci) |
Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to October 30, 2023 re #10 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Claimant JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gray, Stephen) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Budget Car Rental Receipt, #2 Exhibit 2- Motel 6 Receipt, #3 Exhibit 3- Affidavit of Adam Buchta, #4 Exhibit 4- Affidavit of Erik Collins, #5 Exhibit 5- Notice of Claim)(Cosby, Traci) |
Filing 10 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Claimant JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Seized Property Receipt, #2 Affidavit Jose Garcia Affidavit)(Gray, Stephen) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Substitution Civil Cover Sheet - the United States of America is directed to file Docket 6-1 as a stand alone filing within 7 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 9/20/2023. (JRB) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLAIM, filed by Claimant JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR (Gray, Stephen) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen G. Gray on behalf of Claimant JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR. (Gray, Stephen) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cosby, Traci) |
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR WARRANT for Arrest of Property.. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/23. Electronic notice to USM-C.(JRB) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Traci Marie Cosby on behalf of Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Cosby, Traci) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Forfeiture In Rem against $299,745.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Warrant for Arrest of Property)(Cosby, Traci) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.