HOLDER v. MARBERRY et al

HOLDER v. MARBERRY et al

Case Number:	2:2010cv00036
Filed:	February 1, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Larry J. McKinney
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 6, 2011	Filing 64 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment as to Specified Retaliation Claims; For the reasons explained in this Entry, the defendants' 40 motion for summary judgment is granted. Summary judgment must be granted in favor of Warden Marberry and Counselor Ryherd as well. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the Entry issued on September 28, 2011, shall now issue. (see Entry for details) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/6/2011.(NKD)
September 28, 2011	Filing 61 Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Failure-to-Exhaust Defense - defendants' 40 motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claim that he was improperly removed from his prison job as a unit orderly (hereafter &q uot;the loss of orderly position claim") must be granted. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/28/2011. (see entry for details) (copy to plaintiff via US mail) (VS)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 6, 2011

Filing 64 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment as to Specified Retaliation Claims; For the reasons explained in this Entry, the defendants' 40 motion for summary judgment is granted. Summary judgment must be granted in favor of Warden Marberry and Counselor Ryherd as well. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the Entry issued on September 28, 2011, shall now issue. (see Entry for details) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/6/2011.(NKD)

September 28, 2011

Filing 61 Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Failure-to-Exhaust Defense - defendants' 40 motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claim that he was improperly removed from his prison job as a unit orderly (hereafter &q uot;the loss of orderly position claim") must be granted. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/28/2011. (see entry for details) (copy to plaintiff via US mail) (VS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOLDER v. MARBERRY et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?