LOVETT et al v. HEATON et al
Plaintiff: LUCINDA LOVETT and MICHAEL LOVETT
Defendant: PAUL B. HARDEN, MICHAEL W. HEATON, LANDON HERBERT and ZACHARY OVERTON
Case Number: 2:2015cv00063
Filed: March 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER - This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider (Dkt. No. 74 ). The motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, DENIES the motion. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/7/2018. (BRR)
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the reasons and to the extent set forth above, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 52 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. This case shall proceed on the following claims: the Plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment claims against Defendants Herbert and Overton (See Entry). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/2/2017. (DW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOVETT et al v. HEATON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL B. HARDEN
Represented By: James S. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL W. HEATON
Represented By: James S. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LANDON HERBERT
Represented By: James S. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZACHARY OVERTON
Represented By: James S. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LUCINDA LOVETT
Represented By: Samuel Mark Adams
Represented By: Michael K. Sutherlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LOVETT
Represented By: Samuel Mark Adams
Represented By: Michael K. Sutherlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?