COPELAND v. USA et al.

Plaintiff: TOMMY COPELAND and ESTATE OF WANDA COPELAND
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 3:2012cv00178
Filed: November 1, 2012
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Evansville Office
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Referring Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 28:2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COPELAND v. USA et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TOMMY COPELAND
Represented By: Crystal Spivey Wildeman
Represented By: Christopher D. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF WANDA COPELAND
Represented By: Crystal Spivey Wildeman
Represented By: Christopher D. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.