LRM HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMPUTER SUPPORT, INC.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District LRM HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMPUTER SUPPORT, INC.

LRM HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMPUTER SUPPORT, INC.

Plaintiff:	LRM HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant:	COMPUTER SUPPORT, INC.
Case Number:	3:2013cv00146
Filed:	July 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Evansville Office
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Presiding Judge:	William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit:	Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 15, 2013	Filing 32 ORDER - Based on CSI's Answer to LRM's Third Amended Complaint, the Courtcannot determine whether it can exercise diversity jurisdiction over this case.The Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer, and conduct whatever investigation nece ssary, to determine whether this Court has diversity jurisdiction. If the parties agree that diversity jurisdiction is proper, they shall file a joint jurisdictional statement by November 25, 2013 setting forth the basis for each of their citizenship s and whether they agree that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. If the parties cannot agree on their respective citizenships or the amount in controversy, any party who disagrees shall file a separate jurisdictional statement by November 25, 2013 setting forth its view regarding the citizenship of each of the parties and the amount in controversy. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/15/2013.(NRN)
September 6, 2013	Filing 20 ORDER that LRM to file a Third Amended Complaint by September 11, 2013 setting forth a basis for this Court's juridiction (SE). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/6/2013.(SMD)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 15, 2013

Filing 32 ORDER - Based on CSI's Answer to LRM's Third Amended Complaint, the Courtcannot determine whether it can exercise diversity jurisdiction over this case.The Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer, and conduct whatever investigation nece ssary, to determine whether this Court has diversity jurisdiction. If the parties agree that diversity jurisdiction is proper, they shall file a joint jurisdictional statement by November 25, 2013 setting forth the basis for each of their citizenship s and whether they agree that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. If the parties cannot agree on their respective citizenships or the amount in controversy, any party who disagrees shall file a separate jurisdictional statement by November 25, 2013 setting forth its view regarding the citizenship of each of the parties and the amount in controversy. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/15/2013.(NRN)

September 6, 2013

Filing 20 ORDER that LRM to file a Third Amended Complaint by September 11, 2013 setting forth a basis for this Court's juridiction (SE). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/6/2013.(SMD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LRM HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMPUTER SUPPORT, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: LRM HOLDINGS, INC.
Represented By:	Robert L. Burkart
Represented By:	Clay W. Havill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: COMPUTER SUPPORT, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?