TRAFFIC TECH, INC. v. GARCIA
Plaintiff: TRAFFIC TECH, INC.
Defendant: GUADALUPE GARCIA
Case Number: 4:2008cv00129
Filed: August 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CLOSED DISMISSED. Plaintiff is awarded final judgment in the amount of $60,833.20 plus post-judgment interest and costs. There is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/8/08.(LBT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TRAFFIC TECH, INC. v. GARCIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRAFFIC TECH, INC.
Represented By: Thomas G. Stayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GUADALUPE GARCIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?