TRAFFIC TECH, INC. v. GARCIA
TRAFFIC TECH, INC. |
GUADALUPE GARCIA |
4:2008cv00129 |
August 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Contract: Other Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Sarah Evans Barker |
William G. Hussmann |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CLOSED DISMISSED. Plaintiff is awarded final judgment in the amount of $60,833.20 plus post-judgment interest and costs. There is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/8/08.(LBT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TRAFFIC TECH, INC. v. GARCIA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TRAFFIC TECH, INC. | |
Represented By: | Thomas G. Stayton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GUADALUPE GARCIA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.