ROBERTS v. MORRIS et al
| DONALD BRUCE ROBERTS |
| D. MORRIS, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and R. VEST |
| 4:2014cv00102 |
| August 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ENTRY GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS, DISCUSSING COMPLAINT, DISMISSING INSUFFICIENT CLAIMS, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted. No assessment of an initial partial filing fe e is feasible at this time. The Floyd County Jail, to the extent it is also named as a defendant, is dismissed because it is a building. The claim against Officer Vest is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. No p artial final judgment shall issue as to the claims dismissed in this Entry. The clerk shall update the docket to reflect the dismissal of defendant Officer Vest and the Floyd County Jail. The claim of excessive force alleged against Officer Morris shall proceed. The clerk shall issue and serve process on defendant Officer D. Morris. Process in this case shall consist of the complaint filed on 8/25/2014, applicable forms, and this Entry. Copy sent to pltf via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/4/2014. (JLM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
