GATX Corporation et al v. Appalachian Fuels, LLC et al
GATX Corporation |
Appalachian Fuels, LLC, Appalachian Holding Company, LLC, Energy Coal Resources, Inc., Illinois Fuel Company, LLC, Illinois Holding Company, Inc., Appalachian Coal Holdings, Inc., Appalachian Environmental, LLC, Bryant Mining, Inc., Mega Mining, LLC, Appalachian Land Company, Appalachian Resources, LLC, Huff Creek Energy Company, Kanawha Development Corp. and Larry Addington |
0:2009cv00041 |
May 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Ashland Office |
Boyd |
David L. Bunning |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 115 OPINION & ORDER: For reasons stated herein Larry Addington's MOTION for Protective Order and/or To Set Aside the Agreed Judgment 111 is DENIED. To the extent his motion seeks a protective order prohibiting the disclosure of Maxwell Adding ton's financial information, that portion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The parties are referred to 28 USC 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 regarding their rights to object to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B Atkins on 9/9/11.(KSS)cc: COR |
Filing 109 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 108 is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court; (2) Plaintiff GATX Corporation is hereby awarded attorney s' fees in the amount of $320,689.66; (a) Dft. Energy Coal Resource, Inc. is liable for the entire amount; (b) Dft. Illinois Holding Company, Inc. and Illinois Fuel Company LLC are jointly and severally liable for only fifteen percent (15%) of that amount, or $48,103.45; and (3) This matter is hereby dismissed and STRICKEN from the active docket of the Court. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/26/11.(KSS)cc: COR |
Filing 101 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER 1)granting 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment by GATX Corporation 2) pursuant to terms ofthe FNCC Lease and the related guaranty agreements, dfts Energy Coal Resources, Inc., Illinois Holding Comcpany, Inc., and Illinois Fuel LLC are JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY liable for damages in amt of $2,195.269.43 3) pursuant to terms of the GATX Lease and the related guaranty agreement dft, Energy Coal Resources Inc., is liable for damages in amt of $3,492,076.33 and 4) court having reached conclusion that judicial economy and efficiency would be best served by referring plaintiff GATX Corporation's remaining claim for atty fees to the presiding Mag. Judge at Ashland, pla claims for atty fees is REFERRED TO Hon. Edward B. Atkins for review and preparation of a R&R pursuant to 28 USC 636(b)(1)(B). Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 6/7/11.(SMT)cc: COR |
Filing 83 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GATX's Motion for Sanctions 58 shall come before the undersigned for an evidentiary hearing on THURSDAY DECEMBER 16, 2010, AT THE HOUR OF 1:00 P.M. in the United States Courthouse, Ashland, Kentucky; (2) Larry Addington's 55 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents and Other Information from GATX Corporation is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. As outlined above, within 10 days of entry of this order GATX shall provide a more complete response to Interrogatory No. 1 of Larry Addington's Second Set of Interrogatories. All other requests for relief in this motion DE# 55 are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B Atkins on 12/7/2010.(KSS)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.