Gist v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Petitioner: Richard D Gist
Respondent: Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Case Number: 0:2010cv00010
Filed: February 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Ashland Office
County: Oldham
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Presiding Judge: Henry R. Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Denying 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Richard D Gist; (2) Action will be dismissed sua sponte and Judgment be entered herewith in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 5/6/10.(CMR)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gist v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard D Gist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?