Gamble v. Helton et al
| Bennie L. Gamble, Jr. |
| Keith Helton, Rebecca Lewis, Employee 1 Unknown, Joseph P. Meko and Holly Goodpaster |
| 0:2010cv00019 |
| February 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Ashland Office |
| Elliott |
| Pro Se |
| Henry R. Wilhoit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, 1) granting 27 MOTION to Dismiss by Holly Goodpaster, Keith Helton, Rebecca Lewis, Joseph P. Meko 2) Gamble's claims under federal law are DISMISSED WITH PREJ; his state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ; 3) court will enter an appropriate judgment 4) matter is STRICKEN FROM DOCKET. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 7/26/12.(SMT)cc: COR, Gamble via USMail
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plf. Gamble's First Amendment privacy claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (2) Plf. Gamble's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (3) Plf. Gamble's state court claims of infliction of emotional distress, trespass to personal property, conversion and interference with economic expectations are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Gamble asserting those claims in state court; (4) Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 4/15/2010.(KSS)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
