McCarty et al v. Arch Wood Protection, Inc. et al
Lloyd McCarty and Beth McCarty |
Arch Wood Protection, Inc., Osmose Inc., Chemical Specialties, Inc., Koppers, Inc., Langdale Forest Products Company and T.R. Miller Mill Company, Inc. |
0:2011cv00109 |
October 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Ashland Office |
Boyd |
Henry R. Wilhoit |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 305 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, approved and adopted as for the opinion of the court 295 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED; 1) GRANTING 245 JOINT MOTION to Exclude testimony regarding the alleged cause of Pulmonary Nodular Lymph oid Hyperplasia pursuant to Rule 702 and Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc 2) denying as moot 255 MOTION to Exclude and 254 MOTION to Exclude or limit the opinions and testimony of defendant's expert Michael Koss MD and Ph ilip S. Guzelian MD 3) granting dfts joint motion for s/j based on pla failure to prove general or specific causation as it pertains to Mr. McCarthy's PNLH and denied as it pertains to his non-PNLH health problems. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 3/31/16.(SMT)cc: COR |
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' Arch Wood Protection, Inc., Chemical Specialties, Inc., Osmose Inc. Motion to Dismiss 22 be OVERRULED. This is an INTERLOCUTORY and NON-APPEALABLE ORDER. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 6/14/2012.(KSS)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.