Odom v. Helton et al
Glenn D. Odom, II |
Christopher Banks, Kevin Dennis, Kevin Williams, Richard Fleming, Gerald Helton, L. Wright and Bonnie Elam |
0:2012cv00080 |
August 15, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Ashland Office |
Lyon |
PSO |
Henry R. Wilhoit |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The "Motion for Summary Judgment" filed by Defendants Gerald Helton, Kevin Dennis, Richard Fleming, Christopher Banks, and Lieutenant L. Wright (DE# 17 ; supplemented at DE# 48 ) is GRANTED; (2) the "Motion to Compel(the production of a prison video recording)" filed by pro se plaintiff Glenn D. Odom, II DE# 25 is DENIED as MOOT; (3) the "Motion to Dismiss" filed by Defendant Kevin Williams DE# 25 is GRANTED; ( 4) the "Motion to Dismiss" filed Defendant Bonnie Elam DE# 36 is GRANTED; (5) the "Motion for Order (to obtain the plaintiff's medical records)" filed by Defendant Bonnie Elam DE# 42 is DENIED as MOOT; (6) the "Motion to Amend/Correct the Complaint" filed by Plaintiff Glenn D. Odom, II, DE# 45 is DENIED; (7) Odom's complaint DE# 1 is DISMISSED; and (8) The Court will enter a judgment contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 8/6/13.(KSS)cc: COR, Odom (via US Mail) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.