Kapenekas v. Warden, FCI Ashland, KY
Petitioner: John Kapenekas
Respondent: Warden, FCI Ashland, KY
Case Number: 0:2016cv00047
Filed: April 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Ashland Office
County: Boyd
Presiding Judge: P SO
Presiding Judge: Henry R. Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER 1) Clerk shall on the CM/ECF cover sheet list "John S. Kapenekas" as an alias designation for petitioner John Kapenekas 2) petition for habeas corpus is DENIED 3) Court will enter judgment. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 7/12/16.(SMT)cc: COR, (SMT).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kapenekas v. Warden, FCI Ashland, KY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Kapenekas
Represented By: Jeremy Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, FCI Ashland, KY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?