Daniels v. Crall et al
| John Larry Daniels and David W. WIlliams |
| Doug Crall, Federic Kemen, Lacy Russell, Joseph Puskar, Denise Burkett, William Greenier and Rick Richards |
| 0:2023cv00037 |
| March 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| P SO |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: it is ORDERED that Danielss motion at DE #6 is DENIED.Ultimately, this action remains DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and if Daniels wants to file a new civil action, he must proceed in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order, dated March 30, 2023. DE #4 .. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 4/11/23. (KSS)cc: CORand Daniels by US Mail
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER : Daniels's #7 Motion is DENIED. This action remains DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Daniels wants to file a new action he must do so in accordance with the Court's #4 MOO. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 4/10/23.(JLS)cc: CORand John Larry Daniels by US Mail
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION "Pro-Se Motion Requesting Interrogatori's From Defendants Correct Care Solutions, Alternatively Leave to Amend Complaint Rule 15(a) Based Upon Approximate "Causation" to the Complaint" by John Larry Daniels Motions referred to PSO. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope postmarked 4-4-23)(KSS)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Appoint Cousnel by John Larry Daniels, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Supporting documents, #2 env, pm 3-29-23)(JLS) Modified on 4/7/2023 to further describe (KSS).
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John Larry Daniels, pro se. (JLS)
|
|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT: (1) Daniels's complaint #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) This specific civil action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and (3) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/30/23.(KSS)cc: CORand Daniels by US Mail
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Daniels's complaint #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) This specific civil action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; (3) All pending motions are DENIED as moot; (4) The Clerk's Office is directed to send Daniels a. an EDKY 520 b. AO-240 c. EDKY 523; (5) If Daniels wants to file a new civil action, he must proceed in accordance with the instructions set forth above; and (6) The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/30/23.(KSS)cc: CORand Daniels by US Mail
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred) (JLS)
|
|
Filing 3
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLS)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT referred to Judge, filed by John Larry Daniels, pro se. No process or filing fees included with filing. (Attachments: #1 Supporting documents, #2 cover ltr, #3 env, no pm)(JLS)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (JLS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
