Coopman v. U.S. of America
Plaintiff: Manuel Coopman
Defendant: U.S. of America
Case Number: 2:2007cv00092
Filed: May 29, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Kenton
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) DENYING 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Manuel Coopman; 2) Plaintiff's Complaint [Record No. 2] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3) This is a FINAL AND APPEALABLE ORDER; 4) The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning. (JMM)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coopman v. U.S. of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manuel Coopman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?