Glover v. Grant County Circuit Court et al
| William K. Glover |
| Grant County Circuit Court and Steve Kellam |
| 2:2010cv00088 |
| April 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Grant |
| David L. Bunning |
| Pro Se |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The court being sufficiently advised, it is ORDERED 1) Plaintiff William K. Glover's First, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims asserted against the defendants, arising from his confinement at the Grant County Det ention Center, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2) Plaintiff William K. Glover's Fourteenth Amendment claims against the Grant circuit Court are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3) Court will enter a separate Judgment. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/16/10.(TED)cc: COR, William Glover
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ordered, 1) Plf William K. Glover's First, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims asserted against the dfts, arising from his confinement at the Grant County Detention Center, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2) Plf William K. Glover's Fourteenth Amendment claims against the Grant Circuit Court are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3) The Court will enter a separate Judgment. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/15/10.(TED)cc: COR, William K. Glover
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
