Arnold et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
William H. Arnold, Tina L. Arnold and Andrew Arnold |
Werner Enterprises, Inc., Sheila Clay-Smitih and Unknown Defendant |
2:2010cv00118 |
May 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Covington Office |
Gallatin |
William O. Bertelsman |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: MINUTE ENTRY ORDER FOR oral argument held 11/22/2010 before Judge William O. Bertelsman. It is ordered 1) That the motion of defendants for an extension of time in which to file a reply 12 be and it hereby is GRANTED; 2) That the motion of defendants to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue or to transfer to a more convenient venue 8 be, and it hereby is DENIED; 3) That discovery shall be completed six (6) months from date of this Order (5/29/10) and shall begin forthwith; 4) No later than December 31, 2010 the defendants shall file their Answer herein, admitting or denying liability, which will be construed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 by the Court and if liability is denied, shall state with particularity the reasons therefor; and 5) That the court anticipates a trial in the summer of 2011 and the parties shall govern themselves accordingly. (Court Reporter Joan Averdick.)Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 11/29/10. (TED)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.