Day v. Beckstrom
Petitioner: Leonard Day
Respondent: Gary Beckstrom
Case Number: 2:2014cv00075
Filed: April 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Boone
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Presiding Judge: Hanly A. Ingram
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION & ORDER: 1) Magistrate Judge's Recommended Disposition 15 is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion; 2) Defendant's objections 18 are OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 4/5/2016.(TJZ)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Day v. Beckstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leonard Day
Represented By: Amy Robinson Staples
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Beckstrom
Represented By: James C. Shackelford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?