Humana Insurance Company of Kentucky v. O'Neal et al
| Humana Insurance Company of Kentucky |
| Whitney O'Neal, Tessa M. Perkins, Jane Doe #1, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and John Doe #2 |
| Whitney O'Neal |
| Tessa M. Perkins |
| Whitney O'Neal |
| Humana Insurance Company of Kentucky |
| 2:2016cv00173 |
| September 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Covington Office |
| Kenton |
| David L. Bunning |
| J. Gregory Wehrman |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Humana's Motion to Dismiss Plf O'Neal's Counterclaim 25 is granted, and O'Neal's Counterclaim is dismissed with prejudice; 2) Def Perkins's Motion for Summary Judgment 28 is granted, and Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Perkins; 3) Def O'Neal's Motions for Judgment ( 24 and 33 ) are denied; 5) The clerk shall distribute to Def Tessa Perkins, as executor of Decedent Ted Hamilton' ;s Estate, the funds that Humana deposited into the Court Registry ( 18 and 21 ), plus accrued interest and less the applicable Registry Fees; 6) This matter is stricken from the Court's active docket; and 7) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/14/2017.(ECO)cc: COR,FINANCE
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
