Sanders et al v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co.
| Rick Sanders and Deidra Sanders |
| Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. |
| Welch Builders, Inc. |
| Calmo |
| 3:2008cv00037 |
| July 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Insurance Office |
| Shelby |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that Dft Motorists Mutual's Motion for S/J [Record No. 86] is GRANTED. A separate Judgment will be entered this date in favor of Dft Motorists Mutual Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/21/2011.(AKR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: the plaintiffs' Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate This Court's Judgment and Ruling Pursuant to FRCP 50 77 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 9/14/2010. (CBD)cc: COR Modified doc. type to "opn" on 9/14/2010 (CBD).
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. The Dfts motion in limine [Record No. 54] is GRANTED. 2. The Plas and their counsel are prohibited from calling Matt Adams as a witness during the trial of this matter. Further, the Plas and their counse l are prohibited from referring to, questioning, or offering evidence during trial that Dft Motorist Mutual instructed Matt Adams to limit the scope of his inspection of the Plas residence. The Plas and their counsel are also prohibited from referrin g to or providing testimony that MattAdams or Motorist Mutual would provide them with a copy of Adams report regarding the investigation of the Plas residence and/or structural problems regarding their residence. 3. The Plas and their counsel are pro hibited from calling David Wilkerson as a witness to testify regarding conversations with Matt Adams. 4. The Plas and their counsel are prohibited from calling Scott Welch to testify regarding specific issues of negligent construction of the Plaintif fs residence. 5. The Plas and their counsel are prohibited from calling Cella Subram, Peggy Hagerty Duffy and Arlis McMhon as expert witnesses during the trial of this matter. 6. The Plas and their counsel are prohibited from making reference to, or offering evidence concerning, any bad faith or unfair settlement claims asserted against Dft Motorist Mutual. 7. The Plas and their counsel are prohibited from questioning adjusters for Dft Motorist Mutual regarding whether the work and services defi ned in the six invoices in issue were reasonable and necessary or unreasonable and excessive. 8. The Dfs obj to the deposition testimony of Scott Moore (pages 21.7 - 22.10 and 29.7 - 29.23) are SUSTAINED. The subject questions and answers may not be presented to the jury during trial. 9. Counsel for the Plas shall inform all witnesses to be called during trial regarding the limits of their testimony as outlined above. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/1/2009. (AKR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendant Motorists Mutuals motion for summary judgment 38 is DENIED 2. Plaintiffs Rick and Deidra Sanders motion for summary judgment 41 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/27/2009.(CBD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Dft Motorists Mutual Insurance Company's mtn to bifurcate & to stay discovery [Record No. 3] is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/7/2008.(AKR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
