Baze v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
| Ralph Stephens Baze, Jr. |
| Kentucky Department of Corrections, John D. Rees, Lisa Lamb, Tom Simpson and Alan Brown |
| 3:2008cv00054 |
| July 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Lyon |
| Pro Se |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinions and Orders entered in this action on November 25, 2008 5 , March 3, 2009 13 , and this date 40 , and pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. This matte r is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/31/2011.(CBD)cc: COR (Ralph Baze Jr.) Modified doc. type on 1/31/2011 (CBD).
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants John Rees, Tom Simpson, and Alan Brown 10 is GRANTED. The claims asserted against these Defendants by Plaintiff Ralph Baze are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/3/2009. (CBD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The following claims are DISMISSED, sua sponte, without prejudice: (a) all federal and state claims seeking monetary damages asserted against all Dfts; and (b) federal claims seeking injunctive or declaratory re lief asserted against Dft KDOC. (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward by certified mail, return receipt requested, one copy of the Complaint and this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the Office of the General Counsel for the Kentucky Dept of Corrections, Frankfort, Kentucky.General Counsel shall have ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order to complete and file a notice of waiver of service against any or all of the named Dfts. If a wavier is not filed withing ten (10) days, the Clerk shall notify the Pro Se Office to prepare for service on the individual Dfts. (3) The Answer to the Complaint shall be filed no later than 60 days after the noticeof waiver of service is filed. However, if service on the individual Dfts is required, the Answer shall be filed no later than 20 days after service of summons. (4) The Pla shall keep the Clerk of the Court informed of his current mailing address. Failure to notify the Clerk of any address change may result in dismissal of t his case. (5) For every further pleading or other document the Pla wishes to submit for the Courts consideration, the Pla shall serve upon each Dft or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon each attorney, a copy of the pleading or other doc ument. The Pla shall send the original papers to be filed with the Clerk of the Court together with a certificate stating the date a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to each Dft or counsel. The Court will disregard any notice or motio n which does not include this certification. (6) The Pla must communicate with the Court solely through notices or motions filed with the Clerks Office. The Court will disregard correspondence sent directly to the Judges chambers. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/25/2008.(AKR)cc: COR, Gen Counsel, KY Dept of Corrections w/copy of complaint, cert mail,retn recpt requested
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
