Cammack New Liberty, LLC et al v. Vizterra, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Cammack New Liberty, LLC, Scott Cammack, Sigretto, LLC and Curtis J. Sigretto
Defendant: Vizterra, LLC, International Greetings USA, Inc., Lawrence Louis and Adrian Brown
Case Number: 3:2009cv00015
Filed: April 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Owen
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. The Defendants renewed motion to dismiss [Record No. 34] is DENIED as moot. 2. The Plaintiffs motion for extension of time to serve Defendant Louis [Record No. 37] is GRANTED. Defendant Louis is deemed s erved as of November 13, 2009. 3. The Plaintiffs motion for attorneys fees [Record No. 37] is DENIED. 4. Defendant Louis motion to clarify and motion for extension of time to file an Answer [Record No. 42] are GRANTED. The proceedings as to the Plaintiffs claims against Louis are stayed pending resolution of the equitable claims in state court. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/5/2009. (AKR)cc: COR
August 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The Dfts motion to dismiss [Record No. 5] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED in part. The Dfts alternative request to compel arbitration is DENIED, without prejudice to being presented to a st ate court for resolution. (2) The Plas claims for an accounting and declaratory judgment [Record No. 1] are remanded to the Owen Circuit Court for further proceedings. (3) The Plas claims for breach of contract and damages [Record No. 1] will remain on this Courts active docket.(4) The Dfts request for oral argument is DENIED. (5) The Plas Motion to Remand and to Amend the Courts July 20, 2009, Memorandum Opinion and Order [Record No. 29] is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/6/2009.(AKR)cc: COR
July 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Dft's mtn to dismiss [Record No. 5] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED in part. Dft's alternative request to compel arbitration is DENIED, without prejudice to being presented to a state c ourt for resolution. (2) Plas' claims for an accounting and declaratory judgment [Record No. 1] are dismissed, with prejudice. (3) Plas' claims for breach of contract and damages [Record No. 1] will remain on this Court's active docket. (4) Dft's request for oral argument is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/20/2009. (AKR)cc: COR
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that the plas' mtn for remand [Record No. 7] is DENIED. (Motions terminated: 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court). Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/13/2009.(AKR)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cammack New Liberty, LLC et al v. Vizterra, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cammack New Liberty, LLC
Represented By: Brian F. Eviston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Cammack
Represented By: Brian F. Eviston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sigretto, LLC
Represented By: Brian F. Eviston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis J. Sigretto
Represented By: Brian F. Eviston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vizterra, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Greetings USA, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas McIntosh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Louis
Represented By: Thomas McIntosh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adrian Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?