Baze v. Jump et al
| Ralph Baze |
| Sally Jump and Unknown Employees |
| 3:2010cv00022 |
| April 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Frankfort Office |
| Lyon |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Pro Se |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
JUDGMENT: 1. The redress of grievances, due process, equal protection, and right of access claims asserted in numerical paragraphs 11, 12, and 13 of the complaint by Plaintiff Ralph Baze against Defendants Sally Jump and other unknown employees of t he Franklin Circuit Clerks office, in their individual and official capacities, are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants with respect to these claims. 2. The tort claim asserted under KRS 522.020 and set forth in numerical paragraph 13 of the complaint by Plaintiff Ralph Baze against Defendants Sally Jump and other unknown employees of the Franklin Circuit Clerks office, in their individual and official capacities, is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 3. The Cour t certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 4. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. 5. This civil action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 5/7/2010.(CBD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
