Pruitt et al v. Genie Industries, Inc. et al
| Leon D. Pruitt and Rebecca Pruitt |
| Genie Industries, Inc., Terex Corporation, Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. and Ashtead Group plc |
| 3:2010cv00081 |
| December 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Frankfort Office |
| Owen |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
182
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Record No. 159 ) is GRANTED. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.'s third-party indemnity claim against Mahan is DISMISSED, with prejudice. 2. Genie Indu stries, Inc.'s and Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.'s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (Record No. 160 ) is GRANTED. Zurich American Insurance Company's intervening claims against Genie and Sunbelt are DISMISSED, with prejudice. 3. Sunbelt Re ntals, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Record No. 161 ) is GRANTED with respect to C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC's counterclaims for wrongful use of civil proceedings (Count Three) and subrogation (Count Four). Mahan's co unterclaims against Sunbelt for wrongful use of civil proceedings and subrogation are DISMISSED, with prejudice. The motion is DENIED regarding Mahan's counterclaim for declaratory judgment (Count One). 4. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Record No. 163 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/6/2013.(AKR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
181
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Genie Industries, Inc.'s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 146 is GRANTED. 2. With the exception of the subrogation claim (Count Four), the cross claims asserted by C.J. Mahan Construction Company against Genie Industries, Inc. are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/10/2013.(CBD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Record No. 61 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Amended Complaint previously tendered by the plaintiffs. 2. Amended S cheduling Order is again amended in following respects: A. dfts disclose I.D. of expert witnesses & written repts due by /15/12. B. Dfts complete all discovery, including expert witness discovery, by 5/15/12. Plaintiffs depo of expert w itn designated by dfts ext through & including 6/15/12. Plaintiffs' deadline to complete all other discovery shall not be extended beyond 3/15/12. C. Dispositive motions, motions in limine & Daubert motions extended to 7 /2/12. D. Pretrial conference prev sched for 7/24/12 is CONTINUED until Tuesday, 11/20/12 at 10 am, at US Courthouse in Frankfort, KY. E. Jury trial prev sched 9/11/12 is CONTINUED until Tuesday, 1/22/2013 at 10 am, at US Courthouse in Frankfort, KY. 3. Hearing prev sched in matter for 3/9/12 is CANCELED and SET ASIDE. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/29/2012.(AKR)cc: COR, diary Modified by correcting bolding on 2/29/2012 (AKR).
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) C.J. Mahan Construction Company's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer and Counter Claim and Cross Claim (Record No. 35 ) is GRANTED. (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Amended Answer and Counterclaim previously tendered by the Third Party Defendant, C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC. (Record No. 35-2). Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/7/2011.(AKR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
