Bruner et al v. Conway et al
Wildcat Moving, LLC and Raleigh Bruner |
3:2012cv00057 |
August 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Frankfort Office |
Franklin |
Danny C. Reeves |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiffs Raleigh Bruner's and Wildcat Moving, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment 72 is GRANTED with respect to their claims that KRS § 281.615 et seq., and implementing regulations, violate the due p rocess and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Plaintiffs' remaining claims are DISMISSED. 2. The Defendants and their agents, officers, and successors, are ENJOINED from enforcing KRS & #167; 281.615 et seq., and any implementing regulations, as a "Competitor's Veto" as described above in the context of the moving service industry. 3. All claims having been resolved, this matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 4. A separate Judgment shall issue this date. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/3/2014.(CBD)cc: COR |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiffs' First Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction 43 is GRANTED. 2. Effective immediately, and subject to subsequent orders from this Court, the Defendants, as well as their attorneys, agents, officers, representatives, and employees, are ENJOINED from enforcing or attempting to enforce against Plaintiffs Raleigh Bruner and Wildcat Moving, LLC, the Certificate requirement of KRS § 281.615(1), including, but not limited to, in the matter of Commonwealth v. Wildcat Moving, No. 13-CI-645 in the Franklin Circuit Court. 3. The Court hereby WAIVES the requirement of security under Rule 65(c) of the FRCP because the preliminary injunction will require t he Defendants to sustain little or no cost or damage and because the suit is brought in the public interest. See Moltan Co. v. Eagles Picher Indus., 55 F.3d 1171, 1176 (6th Cir. 1995). 4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to immediately forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion (via Facsmile) to the Franklin Circuit Court. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 6/13/2013.(CBD)cc: COR, Franklin Circuit Court Clerk via facsmile |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: that Dfts' mtn to dismiss (Record No. 26 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/25/2013. (AKR)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.