Conway v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Sean Conway
Case Number: 3:2013cv00007
Filed: February 25, 2013
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Frankfort Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2014 16 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendant PRAs Motion to Dismiss 7 is DENIED; and 2. Plaintiff Conways Motion to Strike 11 is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/31/2014. (CBD)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conway v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sean Conway
Represented By: James Hays Lawson
Represented By: Kenneth J. Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.