Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
| Static Control Components, Inc. |
| Lexmark International, Inc. |
| Lexmark International, Inc. |
| Static Control Components, Inc. and Lexmark International, Inc. |
| Static Control Components, Inc. |
| Council for Marketing and Opinion Research |
| Cardinal Cartridge, Inc. |
| MB Sales and Curtis-Young Corporation |
| 5:2004cv00084 |
| February 24, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| James B Todd |
| Gregory F. Van Tatenhove |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1530
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GRANTING Static Control's 1473 MOTION for Wrongful Injunction Damages in Case No 5:02-cv-571; (2) the clerk of the court is directed to release the security bond in the amount of $250,000 posted by Lexmark on 2/11/03 to Static Control; (3) DENYING Static Control's 1509 MOTION for Hearing; (4) DENYING Lexmark's 1527 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Exhibits in Support of Lexmark's Opposition to SCC's Motion for Wrongful Injunction Damages in Case No. 5:02-CV-571-GFVT. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 4/24/12.(KJR)cc: COR,Finance
|
|
Filing
1521
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the MOTION for New Trial by Lexmark International, Inc. 1458 is DENIED. Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 10/28/2010.(GLD)cc: COR,6CCA
|
|
Filing
1448
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Static Control's Motion to Dismiss 1432 is DENIED; (2) parties shall w/in 30 days of date of entry of this Order, exchange draft judgments consistent with representations made by counsel during teleconference held on 4/14/09, and submit to Court a proposed Final Judgment for entry in the record. Signed by Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 8/13/09.(GLD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
1443
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1)Static Control's Motion to Reconsider the Interlocutory Order 1008 1422 is GRANTED; (2)Court finds Lexmark's Prebate terms are not enforceable under patent law; (3)Court to schedule a telephonic status conference in this matter by subsequent order. Signed by Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 03/31/2009.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
1430
MEMORANDUM OPINION: (1) For reasons set forth in this Memorandum Opinion, Lexmark's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Direct Infringement, Inducement of Infringement and Patent Exhaustion 1383 is DENIED; Lexmark Internat ional Motion that the Court should not Rule on Static Control's Affirmative Equitable Defenses 1385 is GRANTED; Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law regarding patent misuse 1381 is DENIED AS MOOT; Renewed Motion For Judgment As Matter Of Law regarding laches, equiptable estoppel and statute of limitations 1384 is DENIED AS MOOT IN PART AND OTHERWISE DENIED. 1429 . Signed by Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 10/03/2008.(GLD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
