Sanford v. Main Street Baptist Church Manor, Inc. et al
| 5:2006cv00187 |
| June 7, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Karl S. Forester |
| James B Todd |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION & ORDER: The 54 MOTION to Alter or Amend 53 Judgment by William Sanford is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on March 19, 2010.(AWD) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION & ORDER: (1) Southeastern's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and judgment will be entered in favor of Southeastern. (2) The Manor's 16 Motion to Dismiss/Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and judgment will be ente red in favor of the Manor. (3) Sanford's claims based on Title VII and the Kentucky Civil Rights Act are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (4) This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket. (5) A judgment consistent with this Opinion & Order will be entered contemporaneously. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on November 20, 2009. (AWD) cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanford v. Main Street Baptist Church Manor, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
