Birdsong, Jr. v. Bishop et al
5:2006cv00297 |
September 12, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Joseph M. Hood |
Pro Se |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (1) the motion for summary jmt 75 filed by Dft Ron Bishop is GRANTED; (2) the motion for summary jmt 82 filed by Dfts Rex McConnell, M.D. and Jonathan Bowen is GRANTED; (3) the motion for summary 84 jmt filed by Dfts Larry Chandler and Scott Haas is GRANTED; (4) the motion for summary jmt 85 filed by dfts Frederick Kemen, M.D. and Lawrence Duvall, M.D. is GRANTED; and (5) this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Order in favor of the named dfts. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/26/08.(MB)cc: COR |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) The 2 complaint in this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously w/ this Memorandum Opinion & Order in favor of the named dfts. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood. (MWZ)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Birdsong, Jr. v. Bishop et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.