Singleton v. Select Specialty Hospital - Lexington, Inc. et al
| Will Singleton |
| Select Specialty Hospital - Lexington, Inc. and Select Medical Corporation |
| 5:2007cv00230 |
| July 18, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 86 Motion for Bill of Costs is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2) Clerk shall tax as costs the amount of $16,622.29. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 6/10/2009.(SCD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Dfts' 35 , 36 , 37 Motions in limine are GRANTED; 2) Evidence concerning the following shall be excluded from trial: a) Evidence of Non-Similarly Situated Employees at Select Specialty Hospital - Lexington, Inc ., b) Evidence of complaints of discrimination from other Select employeees, c) Extrinsic evidence regarding the Select CEO's involvment in alleged billing fraud or improper billing practices, or any question of witnesses regarding the same. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 1/29/2009.(SCD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Dfts' 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2) Dfts' 23 , 27 , 28 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 1/27/2009.(SCD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
