Fortney et al v. Polehinke
Sarah King Fortney |
James Polehinke |
5:2007cv00309 |
September 26, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Fayette |
Karl S. Forester |
Airplane |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Airline Crash |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER: Crew Plts' 60 Motion for Leave to amend response is GRANTED; Jeppesen's 54 Motion for Bill of Costs is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEW request upon conclusion of pending appeal. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 12/1/2008. (STB)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fortney et al v. Polehinke | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sarah King Fortney | |
Represented By: | Peter Perlman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James Polehinke | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.