Smith et al v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
| Eugene Smith and LaToy Smith |
| Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Police Department and Unnamed Defendants |
| 5:2008cv00183 |
| April 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Pla's 84 MOTION to Vacate, Alter, Amend And/Or To Set Aside Order granting summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 6/7/2011.(GLD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The Court pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c)(3), exercises its discretion not to make "needless decisions of state law," and shall dismiss without prejudice Plas' remaining claims against Dft. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 5/9/2011.(SCD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) LFUCG's 26 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Answer to Complaint is GRANTED; (2) Clerk to FILE tendered Amended Answer to Amended Complaint in the record of this matter; (3) w/in 21 days from date of service of t his Order, parties, by counsel, shall meet to discuss claims & defenses & possibilities for prompt settlement or resolution of case, arrange for disclosures & develop a proposed discovery plan; (4) file joint status report 10 days after meeting. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 01/08/2010.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Court's Momorandum Opinion & Order 19 is DISCHARGED IN PART; (2) Pla's claim for relief in the form of injunction that would prohibit dfts from transferring Pla's personal property to any state or fede ral agency & order directing Dfts to return the money & 3 vehicles seized on 3/13/08, to Plas shall be DISMISSED AS MOOT; (3) Pla's 21 MOTION to Set Aside is DENIED; (4) Dfts have 21 days from entry of this order to file a responsive pleading to Plas' Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 12/29/2009.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1)Pla's 14 MOTION to Alter, Amend, &/or Vacate Memo Opinion & Order filed 12/2/08 is GRANTED; (2)stay placed by 13 Order filed 12/2/08 is LIFTED; (3)portion of Courts' 13 Order of 12/2/08 requiring Pla to show cause id DISCHARGED; (4)parties have 10 days for entry of this Order to SHOW CAUSE why plas' remaining claim should not be dismissed w/prej; (5)that 4 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 03/30/2009.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1)Dft 5 Motion to Stay is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART; (2)proceedings related to Plas' claims for monetary relief is STAYED; (3)Plas shall SHOW CAUSE w/in 10 days form entry of this Order why claims for decl aratory & injunctive should not be DISMMISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (4) parties to file a STATUS REPORT w/in 10 days from this Order as to status of any pending criminal matters which are germane to present matter & any issues which may impact the procee dings in this case; (5) Clerk to note that Ex Parte Motion for Restraining Order &/or Temporary Injunction [record # 1-3] was terminated while this matter was pending before the state court & not pending before this Court. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 12/2/2008. (RJD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
