Todd v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Plaintiff: Keith Todd
Defendant: Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Case Number: 5:2008cv00295
Filed: July 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Presiding Judge: James B Todd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Dft LFUCG's 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) Plt Todd's 19 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 12/10/2009.(STB)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Todd v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Todd
Represented By: Robert L. Abell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?