Holman v. Beauchamp
| Alisa L. Beauchamp |
| 5:2008cv00384 |
| September 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Motor Vehicle Office |
| Fayette |
| Karl S. Forester |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Dft's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 28 is GRANTED; Pla's claim for punitive damages is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 8/19/09.(GLD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that dft's 14 motion to exclude testimony of Michael Barnes is DENIED and Pla's motion for leave to serve FRCP26(a)(2)(B) disclosure and report of rebuttal witness, Michael Barnes 32 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 8/7/09.(GLD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holman v. Beauchamp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alisa L. Beauchamp | |
| Represented By: | Lynsie T. Gaddis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
