Washington v. City of Georgetown et al
Lillian N. Washington |
City of Georgetown, Karen Tingle-Sames, Rogell Blankenship, Terry Thomas, James L. Burgess and Janice Wise |
5:2008cv00402 |
October 1, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Scott |
Karl S. Forester |
Both |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 OPINION & ORDER: (1) dfts' 42 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages is GRANTED; (2) dfts' 43 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, & a judgment in favor of dfts will be entered contemporaneously w/this Opinion & Order; (3) Washington's 45 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 09/29/2010. (RJD)cc: COR |
Filing 13 OPINON & ORDER: (1)dfts' 8 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that the following claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b)(6); (2) dfts' motion to dismiss Washingto n's claims against the remaining dfts based on respondents superior is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (3) dfts' motion to dismiss is DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. Washington's invasion of privacy claims against Wise based on her alleged pos session & publication of certain "other documents," as well as Washington's claims against the other dfts, REMAIN PENDING. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 03/03/2009.(RJD)cc: COR Modified to add text "Opion" on 3/3/2009 (RJD). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.