Harper v. USA
Plaintiff: Walter Joe Harper
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 5:2008cv00403
Filed: October 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2671 Federal Tort Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) dft's 20 Motion to Strike Pla's record is DENIED; (2)USM's 15 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; (3) pla 2 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) Judgment to be entered comtemporaneously w/this Memorandum Opinion & Order in favor of the Dft. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 09/30/2009.(RJD)cc: COR,PLA
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harper v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Joe Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?