Cochran v. Folger et al
| Rodney Cochran |
| Curt Folger, Dan Gilliam and Don Gilliam |
| 5:2009cv00302 |
| September 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Lincoln |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| James B Todd |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) dfts 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; (2) plas claims under Fourth Amendment & Fourteenth Amendment due process clause, based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, remains pending; (3) plas claims that his Fifth Amendment claim for taking without just compensation, based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) plas failure to train claim against dft, Curt Folger, DISMISSED with prejudice; (5) plas claims against all dfts in their official capacities are DISMISSED w/prejudice; (6) plas claim for punitive damages remains pending. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 09/16/2010.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 31 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 2) Dfts' contribution claim against the Third Party Dfts is DISMISSED w/ prejudice. 3) Dfts' indemnity claim, to extent it is based on 42 USC 1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4) Dfts' indemnity claim, to extent it is based on the state law claims of outrage remains pending. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 7/6/2010.(SCD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
