Davenport v. SSA
| Lewis E. Davenport |
| SSA |
| 5:2009cv00403 |
| December 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Oldham |
| Karl S. Forester |
| Pro Se |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Davenport's 2 Petition for a Writ of Mandamus is DENIED; (2) Davenport's 6 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED; (3) Court will enter an appropriate judgment & this matter shall be CLOSED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 03/11/2010.(RJD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davenport v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lewis E. Davenport | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: SSA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
