Strange v. Stryker Corporation
Plaintiff: David J. Strange
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Case Number: 5:2014cv00060
Filed: February 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendant's Motion to Strike, 24 , is GRANTED,and DE 21 and [21-1] SHALL be stricken from the record; and 2. that Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment, 17 , is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 06/01/2015.(LC)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strange v. Stryker Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David J. Strange
Represented By: Tracey Elizabeth Burkett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Represented By: Mary Louise Kovalesky
Represented By: Susan C. Sears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?