Rice v. Montgomery County, Kentucky et al
| Montgomery County, Kentucky, Eric Jones, Southern Health Partners, Inc., Ronald Waldridge, Patrina Tipton, Justin Crockett, Avon Garrison, Larry Oakley and Jerry Schultz |
| 5:2014cv00181 |
| May 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Montgomery |
| Karen K. Caldwell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
OPINION AND ORDER: A) 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1) GRANTED as to all claims against Justin Crockett and Larry Oakley and all claims against those dfts are DISMISSED. 2) GRANTED as to constit utional claim against Avon Garrison and Jerry Schultz and those claims are DISMISSED. 3) GRANTED as to the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress and that claim is DISMISSED. 4) GRANTED as to the claims of negligence, negligence per se and gross negligence against the county and those claims are DISMISSED. 5) GRANTED as the claim of negligence per se against Eric Jones, Avon Garrison, Jerry Schultz and those claims are DISMISSED. B) 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1) GRANTED as to the claim of intentional emotional distress and that claim is DENIED. 2) Motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 5/5/2016.(SCD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
