Sanford E. Levy, LLC v. Five Star Roofing Systems, Inc. et al
Sanford E. Levy, LLC |
Five Star Roofing Systems, Inc. and Christopher Spegal |
5:2014cv00253 |
June 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Fayette |
Joseph M. Hood |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GRANTING Five Star's 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment in which it argues that Levy's claim for breach of contract is barred by the doctrine of res judicata; (2) DENYING Levy's 52 cross-MOTION for Su mmary Judgment as to its claim for breach of contract as well as for its claim to pierce the corporate veil & for atty fees; (3) GRANTING IN PART & DENYING IN PART Five Star's 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to its counterclaims for brea ch of contract & invasion of privacy; (4) GRANTING IN PART & DENYING IN PARTY Levy's 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment with respect to Five Star's counterclaims for breach of contract, invasion of privacy & declaratory relief; (5) that this matter remains set for a Bench Trial on 11/17/15 with respect to Count I of Five Star's Counterclaim; parties shall endeavor to resolve the sole remaining issue prior to that date. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/10/15.(KJR)cc: COR |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: GRANTING dft Five Star Roofing Systems' 34 MOTION for Leave to Amend Answer to Assert Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 6/10/15.(KJR)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.