Smith v. Parks et al
Michael R. Smith |
Paul Parks, Brad Hislope and City of Harrodsburg |
5:2014cv00260 |
July 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Mercer |
Karen K. Caldwell |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 OPINION & ORDER: 1. The dfts' Motions for S/J 88 89 are DISMISSED AS MOOT. 2. This action is DISMISSED w/prejudice and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and 3. All other dates previously scheduled are hereby CANCELED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 01/19/2017.(LC)cc: COR, Plaintiff via US Mail |
Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER: 1. Smith's Motion to Recuse 59 is DENIED. 2. Smith's five motions for Lump Sum Judgments 64 67 80 82 85 are DENIED. 3. Deputy Parks' Motion to Preclude Plaintiff from Filing Additional Motions or Pleadings Wi thout Leave of the Court 63 is GRANTED; a. Smith shall not file any additional motions, pleadings or other documents in this matter without prior express leave from the Court. If Smith desires leave to file a motion or pleading, he shall submit a m otion titled " motion for Leave to File" and describe the nature of his proposed motion or pleading. b. If any Defendant files a motion in this matter, Smith is permitted to file one (1) response to each motion. 4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to accept only the following from Michael Ray Smith in this matter: (a) an above-described Motion for Leave to File, and (b) one (1) response to each motion filed by the Defendants. The Clerk shall not accept any other motions, pleadings, o r other documents filed by Michael Ray Smith in this matter, unless he has received prior leave from the Court. In the event that Smith files an unauthorized motion, pleading, or other document, the Clerk shall notify the Court by making a notation i n the Record and include a copy of the tendered documents. 5. The Defendants SHALL NOT file a response to any unauthorized motion, pleading, or other document that is merely noted in the Record as provided by paragraph four above.Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 05/17/16.(LC)cc: COR, Plaintiff Smith via US Mail |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Smith's 19 Motion for Order is DENIED as premature. (2) Smith's 23 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. (3) Smith's 26 Motion to Amend his Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED as moot becau se Pla has withdrawn his request. (4) Smith's reassertion of his Motion for Default Judgment, self-styled as a "Response," ( 31 ) is DENIED. (5) Smith's 36 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (6) Smith's 38 Motion for Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on August 27, 2015. (AWD) cc: COR,Pla via US Mail |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time until March 23, 2015, to effectuate service on all defendants; 2. Defendants Brad Hislope and the City of Harrodsburg's motion to dismiss 3 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Defendant Paul Parks's motion to dismiss 5 is DENIED WITHOUTPREJUDICE; 4. Plaintiff Michael Smiths Motion for Hearing 15 is DENIED AS MOOT as plaintiff has withdrawn this motion; and 5. Plaintiff Michael Smith's Motion for Order 16 is DENIED AS PREMATURE as the parties have not yet exchanged information through discovery. After proper service and answers, the Court will enter a scheduling order explaining how the parties should proceed with discovery and dispositive motions. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 2/23/15.(LC)cc: COR, Plaintiff via U.S. Mail |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.