Berry et al v. Fayette County Sheriff
Plaintiff: Van Berry and Joshua Bedson
Defendant: Office of the Fayette County Sheriff
Case Number: 5:2014cv00356
Filed: September 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The plaintiffs' objection to the proposed testimony of Chief Dewayne Holman is SUSTAINED. 2. The defendant's objection to the proposed testimony of Sylvia Albright is OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/7/2016.(STC)cc: COR
February 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. Plts' 97 Motion in Limine seeking to preclude dft from offering general testimony regarding dates plts attended roll call is DENIED; 2. Plt's 98 Motion in Limine seeking to preclude dft from introducing evidence regarding paid lunch breaks is GRANTED; 3. Plts' 99 Motion in Limine seeking to prohibit dft from raising a de minimis or a failure to mitigate defense is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/10/2016. (STC)cc: COR
December 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. 80 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by James Dunn, Joshua Bedson, Van Berry, is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as set forth herein; 2. 82 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Office of the Fayette County Sheriff is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/16/2015.(STC)cc: COR
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: DENYING dft's 50 MOTION for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 6/25/15.(KJR)cc: COR
February 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that plas' 15 MOTION for conditional certification is DENIED; Court will not facilitate notice to members of the proposed class. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on February 5, 2015. (MWZ) cc: COR
November 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's 8 Motion for More Definite Statement is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/14/2014. (STC)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry et al v. Fayette County Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Van Berry
Represented By: Andrew Frisch
Represented By: C. Ryan Morgan
Represented By: Jonathan A. Rabinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Bedson
Represented By: Andrew Frisch
Represented By: C. Ryan Morgan
Represented By: Jonathan A. Rabinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the Fayette County Sheriff
Represented By: Cynthia L. Effinger
Represented By: Daniel Luke Morgan
Represented By: Kembra Sexton Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?