Gamble v. Bottom
Petitioner: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Respondent: Don Bottom
Case Number: 5:2014cv00437
Filed: December 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: McCracken
Presiding Judge: Edward B. Atkins
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The Magistrate Judge's 3 Order is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the Court's decision. (2) The 1 Petition of Bennie L. Gamble for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (3) No certificate of appealability shall issue. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on January 23, 2015. (AWD) cc: Petitioner via US Mail
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gamble v. Bottom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Don Bottom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?