Hensley v. SSA
Plaintiff: James O. Hensley
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Case Number: 5:2015cv00066
Filed: March 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff Hensley's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; Commissioner's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment in favor of dft shall be entered. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 7/21/2016. (STC)cc: COR Modified on 7/21/2016 (STC).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hensley v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James O. Hensley
Represented By: Michael C. Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Represented By: John S. Osborn, III(Designation Assistant U.S. Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?