Wilson v. SSA
Plaintiff: Chelsey Jean Wilson
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Case Number: 5:2015cv00070
Filed: March 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Dft's Motion for S/J 21 is GRANTED. 2. The decision of ALJ will be AFFIRMED by a separate judgment entered this date. 3. The Clerk will forward a copy of this MOO to the Plaintiff at address listed in this Order. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/13/16.(LC)cc: COR,Plaintiff via U.S. Mail
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsey Jean Wilson
Represented By: Dennis M. Stutsman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?