GGNSC Stanford, LLC et al v. Gilliam
| GGNSC Stanford, LLC, GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC, GGNSC Holdings, LLC, GGNSC Equity Holdings II, LLC, Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC, Golden Gate Ancillary, LLC, GGNSC Clinical Services, LLC and GPH Stanford, LLC |
| 5:2016cv00004 |
| January 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Lincoln |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT: 1. This matter is DISMISSED from the Court's docket, without prejudice. 2. The prior Order compelling arbitration 14 is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Order and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/3/2018.(STC)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The dft's motion 9 to dismiss is DENIED. 2. The Plaintiff's motion 4 to Compel Arbitration and Enjoin State Court Action is GRANTED. 3. Lisa Gilliam is COMPELLED to submit her claims to arbitration accord ing to the terms of her agreement and ENJOINED from proceedings with her action in state court. 4. The Court STAYS this proceedings until the conclusion of the arbitration. Parties directed to file a Joint Status Report each thirty days until the matter is completed.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 09/07/2016.(LC)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
