Tempur Sealy International, Inc. et al v. WonderGel, LLC et al
| Tempur Sealy International, Inc., Tempur-Pedic International, Inc., Tempur-Pedic Management, LLC, Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC and Dan Foam ApS |
| WonderGel, LLC and EdiZONE, LLC |
| 5:2016cv00083 |
| March 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) DENYING IN PART & REMAINING PENDING IN PART pla's 51 Motion for Contempt; (2) pls shall file further papers in support of their motion by 5:00 PM on 4/19/16; (3) that dft WonderGEL shall file further papers in support of its objections by 5:00 PM on 4/20/16; (4) that plas shall file any further reply in support of its motion by 5:00 PM on 4/21/16, at which time this matter shall stand submitted; (5) that WonderGel shall resubmit a copy of the Goldilocks II video (UNDER SEAL) in a format readily readable on the court's equipment by 5:00 PM 4/21/16; in order to determine which forms are advisable, counsel should contact the court's Automation Dept; (6) that the court in its equitable discretio n & recognizing that this Order may hinder Defendant WonderGels e-commerce marketing platform, requires Plaintiffs to post a $100,000 security pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c) (Bond); court concludes that the previously posted bond isadequate i n order to eliminate that concern and that no further security is required; (7) that WonderGel shall immediately discontinue & direct third-parties over whom they may exercise control to discontinue the advertisement known as Goldilocks II including anywhere it appears on the Internet & refrain from any advertising that references or relies upon Goldilocks II or the advertising claims at issue in the Goldilocks II video including in any & all publications, commercial social media accounts, or other traditional oronline marketing venues, pending further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 4/18/16.(KJR)cc: COR,Automation Dept
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: DENYING dfts' 42 MOTION to Stay re 41 Memorandum Opinion & Order, MOTION for Extension of Time & 43 MOTION to Clarify. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 4/11/16.(KJR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: the court finds that granting the relief requested will not harm others as it is very limited in scope & Purple will still be able to advertise its product; the court is persuaded that a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction is appropriate under these circumstances. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 4/1/16.(KJR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
