Tomlin et al v. City of Eubanks et al
Plaintiff: Michael W. Tomlin and Marilyn B. Tomlin
Defendant: City of Eubanks and Bobby Daws
Case Number: 5:2022cv00200
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Referring Judge: Matthew A Stinnett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION to Strike All Affirmative Defenses Contained in #6 Answer to Complaint by Marilyn B. Tomlin and Michael W. Tomlin, pro se. Motions referred to Matthew A. Stinnett. (Attachments: #1 Envelope bearing 9/26/2022 postmark)(JER)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Granting defendants' #12 Motion to Strike #9 RESPONSE by City of Eubanks, Bobby Daws. The Clerk of the Court is directed to STRIKE the pleading captioned "Response to Defendants Affirmative Defenses" filed by the plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 09/21/2022. (SAM)cc: CORand Michael W. Tomlin and Marilyn B. Tomlin by US Mail
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Strike #9 RESPONSE by City of Eubanks, Bobby Daws. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dunaway, Bridget) Modified text on 9/20/2022 (KJR).
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: denying Plas' #10 Motion for the Court to Order mediation. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 09/08/2022. (MDC) cc: COR and Michael & Marilyn Tomlin by US Mail
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Order to Mediation by Marilyn B. Tomlin, Michael W. Tomlin, pro se. Motions referred to Matthew A. Stinnett. (Attachments: #1 Envelope bearing 9/2/2022 postmark)(JER)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STRIKEN FROM DOCKET PER #13 ORDER.
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: 1. This matter is REFERRED to a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings until the time of trial, including preparing proposed findings of fact and recommendations on any dispositive motions. 2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to assign this matter to a United States Magistrate Judge (Stinnett) pursuant to standing orders of the Court. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/26/22.(JLM)cc: COR, and Tomlins by U.S. mail
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #6 Answer to Complaint (JER)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Eubanks, Bobby Daws.(Dunaway, Bridget)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order P SO no longer assigned to case per Chambers.. (JER)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. (SAM)cc: CORand Michael W. Tomlin and Marilyn B. Tomlin by US Mail
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample caption)(SAM)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City of Eubanks, Bobby Daws; Summons issued and returned to counsel via pick-up from Office of Clerk (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SAM)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 500000395), filed by Michael W. Tomlin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Receipt)(SAM)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (SAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tomlin et al v. City of Eubanks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael W. Tomlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marilyn B. Tomlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Eubanks
Represented By: Bridget L. Dunaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobby Daws
Represented By: Bridget L. Dunaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?